fsearchyu Mortgage t Szh i Payment k Mortgage y Homeequitymortgagepayment u Home wisearchlsearchh Equity vsearch searcht Payment e Mortgage y Sweethomeloan e Www Payment f Equity i Equity v Www s Mortgage m Payment nsearch searchn Equity o Home e Payment i Sweethomeloan he Equity f Equity t Home r Mortgage , Home t Szh a
b Home com Equity s Home a jdsearchmsearchn Home searchasearchl,
b Payment t Payment ifsearchysearchusearcha Equity e Home o Equity Mortgage h Home Equity i Payment d Payment i Homeequitymortgagepayment h Payment searchan Equity searchc Sweethomeloan o Home lsearchan Mortgage searchant Mortgage to Mortgage m Equity nsearchm Payment ze Payment t Www e c Home rsearchesearcht Home y Home a Homeequitymortgagepayment s Equity ax Payment Equity o Home wsearchl Equity esearche Equity t Homeequitymortgagepayment o Mortgage h Home v Equity ensearchu Home hsearchofsearchyo Szh r search5 Home Mortgage n Home osearchesearchco Homeequitymortgagepayment vertedsosearcht Equity at Payment ysearchusearchc Equity n Equity deductsearcha Homeequitymortgagepayment l Payment the Www i
v Home stsearche Homeequitymortgagepayment t in Szh erest expense that you have. You certainly do not want to convert more than that. All you would be doing then is increasing your tax. That would be stupid. If I was desiging tax software, I would make it so you couldn’t even do that, which brings us to the sad story of Private Letter Ruling 201217004. Now pay attention, because there will be an assignment at the end.
The PLR concerns a trust. Trusts are taxed in a similar manner to individuals, at least as far as investment interest is concerned:
For Year 1 and Year 2, Trust hired an accounting firm (Firm) to prepare its Form 1041, U.S. Income Tax Return for Estates and Trusts (“Return”). The Firm prepared the Return by entering the relevant data into a tax software computer program (“Software”) but a keying error was made on line 4g of Form 4952, Investment Interest Expense Deduction, that resulted in an inadvertent election to include the entire amount of qualified dividend income and net capital gain in each year. For Year 1 $a [Say $25,000]was treated as investment income for purposes of the deduction for investment interest expense. The actual amount of investment interest in Year 1 was $b [Say $10,000], an amount significantly less than $a. .
Based on my made up numbers, the preparer converted $15,000 of 15% income into ordinary income without getting any benefit. Apparently they made a similar error in the following year. How did this happen ?
The Firm uses the Software to prepare many Forms 1040 during filing season. For Forms 1040, the Software automatically limits an election to include qualified dividend income and net capital gain as investment income for purposes of calculating the deduction for investment interest expense to the amount of investment interest. The Firm relied on the software to calculate investment interest expense in the same manner for the taxpayer’s Return, however the Software does not do this automatically for a Form 1041. The Firm was unaware of the differences in the computer tax software in identifying this type of error.
To err is human. To really screw things up you need a computer. That cackling sound you hear is coming from Jersey City, where Robert Flach, The Wandering Tax Pro, who only does returns by hand, scorning the expensive and unreliable software the rest of us use, is gleefully laughing at another comeuppance of an accounting firm. It gets worse.
The error was discovered by the beneficiary’s business manager. The Firm was contacted by the business manager on Date 1 and was advised of the Form 4952 elections.
Ouch.
The election to treat 15% income as ordinary is revocable, but only with the consent of the IRS. The Service analogized the situation to other rulings that they have made, where taxpayers did not make the election, because their preparers had not informed them about it. So thanks to the astuteness of the business manager, the taxpayer must have gotten a refund. Likely the accounting firm ate the cost of the ruling.
So here is your assignment. If you have margin interest or other investment interest expense, perhaps from a partnership, dig out your returns for the last three years. See if there is a Form 4952 attached. Take a look at Line 4g. If there is nothing there and there is a positive amount on Line 7 (Disallowed Investment Interest) and you had long term capital gains and dividends, you might have benefited from making the election. On the other hand if there is a positive amount on Line 4g and Line 6 (Net Investment Income) is greater than Line 8 (Investment Interest Expense Deduction), you may have been the victim of the same error described in the Private Letter Ruling. I would particularly recommend this exercise if you are responsible for filing a return (Form 1041) for a trust. Good luck and good hunting.
You can follow me on twitter @peterreillycpa.
Peter-
You know me too well!
RDF (The Wandering Tax Pro)